Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2025): Rhombus
INVESTIGACIÓN

The Misunderstanding Between the Strategic Concepts of Entrepreneurship and Innovation

PDF
  • Erick Silesky González
Erick Silesky González
Universidad Latinoamericana de Ciencia y Tecnología (ULACIT)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63058/rhombus.v5i1.277

Publicado 2025-01-20

Palabras clave

  • Innovation,
  • Entrepreneurship,
  • Strategies,
  • Competitive Advantage,
  • Market Orientation

Cómo citar

Silesky González, E. (2025). The Misunderstanding Between the Strategic Concepts of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Rhombus, 5(1), pp. 23–37. https://doi.org/10.63058/rhombus.v5i1.277

Derechos de autor 2024 Rhombus

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Resumen

Entrepreneurship and Innovation Capabilities (Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000)of companies. in the context of individual, small and medium-sized enterprises and its university origins. It has been shown that when corporations have these clear concepts, the implementation of strategies is much easier and effective, there is a better use of competitive advantages, execution of resources and better products are introduced, improving the “time to market”.

PDF

Referencias

  1. Alford, P., & Jones, R. (2020). The lone digital tourism entrepreneur: Knowledge acquisition and collaborative transfer. Tourism Management, 81, 104139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104139
  2. Ali, A. (1994). Pioneering versus incremental innovation: Review and research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(94)90118-X
  3. Alum, R. A. (1986). [Review of Review of Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, by P. F. Drucker]. Public Productivity Review, 10(1), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380320
  4. Argote, L. & Miron-Spektor, E. (2024). Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.062
  5. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: An evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0228-6
  6. Bamiatzi, V. C., & Kirchmaier, T. (2014). Strategies for superior performance under adverse conditions: A focus on small and medium-sized high-growth firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612459534
  7. Banerjee, S., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2015). Indirect learning: How emerging-market firms grow in developed markets. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.12.0328
  8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  9. Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building-ambidexterity-into-an-organization
  10. Chesbrough, H. (2003). The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560304500301
  11. Chong, V. K., & Chong, K. M. (1997). Strategic choices, environmental uncertainty, and SBU performance: A note on the intervening role of management accounting systems. Accounting and Business Research, 27(4), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1997.9729553
  12. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
  13. Daft, R. L. (1982). Bureaucratic versus non-bureaucratic structure and the process of innovation and change. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.). Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 5 (2). (pp. 129–166). JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068400500206
  14. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 677–695. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088133
  15. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row
  16. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121.
  17. Feldman, M. P. (2014). The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Business Economics, 43, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9574-4
  18. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
  19. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
  20. Hitt, M., Sirmon, D, Li, Y., Ghobadian, A., Arregle, J-L & Xu, K. (2021). Institutions, industries and entrepreneurial versus advantage-based strategies: how complex, nested environments affect strategic choice. Journal of Management and Governance, 25, 147–188 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09504-2
  21. Koehler, F., Bastos, L. C., & Bastos, R. C. (2019). Understand the Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation: Roots and future. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss9.1715
  22. Kuratko, D. F. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: Accelerating creativity and innovation in organizations. In C. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press.
  23. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634940
  24. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Miller, A. (1988). A taxonomy of technological settings, with related strategies and performance levels. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090304
  26. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  27. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030102
  28. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110302
  29. Nonaka, I. (1990). Redundant, overlapping organizations: A Japanese approach to managing the innovation process. California Management Review, 32(3), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166615
  30. Olshavsky, R. W. (1980). Time and the rate of adoption of innovations. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 425–428. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488744
  31. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley. http://www.cegesti.org/exitoempresarial/publicaciones/publicacion_119_090810_es.pdf
  32. Porter, E. (2018). Where are the start-ups? Loss of dynamism is impeding growth. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/06/business/economy/start-ups-growth.html
  33. Robertson, T. S. (1971). Innovative behavior and communication. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  34. Rogers, E. M. (1976). Communication and development: Critical perspectives. Sage Publications.
  35. Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers.
  36. Silesky-Gonzalez, E., Lezcano-Calderon, Y., & Mora-Cruz, A. (2024). Effects of education for entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial intention in university students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01039-4
  37. Spencer, J. W., & Gómez, C. (2004). The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: A multicountry study. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1098–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00040-7
  38. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
  39. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207