Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): Derecho en Sociedad
ARTICLES

Between the Cross and the Cartel: Assessing the Effectiveness of an Advocacy Strategy on Religious Violence in Mexico

PDF
  • Thomas de Bruin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63058/des.v19i2.327

Published 2025-09-30

Keywords

  • Sacerdotes,
  • crimen organizado,
  • estrategia de incidencia,
  • México,
  • libertad religiosa

How to Cite

de Bruin, T. (2025). Between the Cross and the Cartel: Assessing the Effectiveness of an Advocacy Strategy on Religious Violence in Mexico. Derecho En Sociedad, 19(2), 101p–138p. https://doi.org/10.63058/des.v19i2.327

Copyright (c) 2025 Derecho en Sociedad

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Altmetrics

Abstract

This thesis has evaluated the effectiveness of the advocacy strategy aimed at improving the situation of priests facing violence perpetrated by organized crime. Due to their societal role within local communities, priests are often subjected to harassment or even assassination. This study has identified the main actors involved in the advocacy strategy as the Centro Católico Multimedial (CCM), the Observatory of Religious Freedom in Latin America (OLIRE), Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW), and Dennis Petri (in his capacity with various organizations).

To date, the advocacy strategy has proven largely ineffective in generating substantial impact or achieving meaningful improvements in the conditions faced by priests. With regard to intermediate outcomes, the strategy has shown limited effectiveness. It has contributed to a certain level of awareness among advocacy targets and the general public, although the extent of this awareness remains unclear.

Moreover, the effectiveness of the advocacy strategy is constrained by several factors: incomplete or inaccurate documentation of incidents, a lack of political will among Mexican authorities to address the issue, and insufficient understanding of religious freedom among policymakers.

PDF

References

  1. Arensman, B. (2018). Negotiating effectiveness: The politics of results in advocacy for development and its evaluation [Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University]. Wagenin- gen University. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/448390
  2. Arensman, B., Barrett, J. B., van Bodegom, A., Hilhorst, D., Klaver, D., van Waegeningh, C., & van Wessel, M. (2015). MFS II joint evaluation of international lobbying and ad- vocacy. Wageningen University & Research.
  3. Arensman, B., van Waegeningh, C., & van Wessel, M. (2018). Twinning “practices of chan- ge” with “theory of change”: Room for emergence in advocacy evaluation. Wagenin- gen University & Research.
  4. Brennan, K., & Morariu, J. (2009). Effective advocacy evaluation: The role of funders. The Foundation Review, 1(3), Article 8. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/tfr/vol1/iss3/8/
  5. Brown, D., Ebrahim, A., & Batliwala, S. (2012). Governing international advocacy NGOs. World Development, 40(6), 1098–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.002
  6. Centro Católico Multimedial. (2019). Reporte 2019 sacerdotes agredidos y asesinados. http://ccm.org.mx/2019/12/reporte-2019 sacerdotes-agredidos-y-asesinados/
  7. Christian Solidarity Worldwide. (2021, June 17). Mexico. https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=017853573119484909968:47znk4uhbno&q=mexico&oq=mexico&gs_l=partner-generic.3...5654.6602.0.6847.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0.csems%2Cnrl%3D13...0.928j223928j6...1.34.partner-generic..0.0.0.
  8. Central Intelligence Agency. (2021). The world factbook: Mexico. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/mexico/#people and-society Committee on Foreign
  9. Affairs, House of Representatives. (2015). Challenges to religious freedom in the Americas: Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Western Hemis- phere. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
  10. Flores, T., & Petri, D. P. (2019). Country overviews and case studies of Mexico, Colombia and Cuba. OLIRE.
  11. Gormley, W. T., & Cymrot, H. (2006). The strategic choices of child advocacy groups. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764005282484
  12. LexisNexis. (2021, June 12). News monitoring. LexisNexis Uni. https://advance.lexis.com/bisacademicresearchhome?crid=3f-3306bb-3690-4afb-a87e-9c54790f1b7f&pdmfid=1516831&pdisurlapi=true
  13. Miertoiu, A. (2018). Advocacy campaigns. Exempt from performance criteria? Babes-Bol-yai University. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Octavian-Moldovan/publication/334965514_Sustainable_Development_and_Resilience_of_Local_Communities_and_Public_Sector_Organizations/links/5d480f4792851cd046a2806d/Sustainable-Develop-ment-and-Resilience-of-Local-Communi
  14. Mosley, J. E. (2011). Institutionalization, privatization, and political opportunity: What tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010362114
  15. OLIRE / CCM. (2019). Thematic hearing request. https://olire.org/es/solicitud-de-audien-cia-tematica-ante-la-comision-interamericana-de-derechos-humanos-sobre-la-violen-cia-contra-sacerdotes-en-mexico/
  16. OLIRE. (2021, June 16). About. https://olire.org/about/
  17. OLIRE. (2021, June 17). Violent incidents database. https://olire.org/monitor/violent-incidents-database/
  18. Petri D.P. (2021). The Regulation of Religion by Organized Crime: Conceptualization of an Underexplored Phenomenon Through a Case Study in Northeast Mexico. Internatio- nal Journal for Religious Freedom 14(1/2):123-141.
  19. Petri, D. P. (2020). The specific vulnerability of religious minorities [Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/the-specific-vulnerability-of-religious-minorities Petri
  20. D.P. & Glasius M.E. (2022). Vulnerability and Active Religious Behavior: Christians and Crime Syndicates in Mexico. Human Rights Quarterly 44(3):514-536. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2022.0025.
  21. Save the Children. (2011). Helping children change their world. https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/pluginfile.php/128097/mod_resource/content/1/Monitoring%20and%20evaluating%20advocacy.pdf
  22. Sotelo Aguilar, S. O., & Gazanini Espinoza, G. (2018). Unidad de Investigaciones Especiales del CCM - Evaluación del sexenio 2012-2018 veintiséis sacerdotes asesinados. Cen- tro Católico Multimedial. http://ccm.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Reporte-2018-OK-2.pdf
  23. Sotelo Aguilar, O. (Director). (2017). Tragedy and crucible of the priesthood in Mexico [Film].
  24. Sotelo Aguilar, O. (2017). Tragedia y crisol del sacerdocio en México. Centro Católico Multimedial.
  25. Stein, D., & Valters, C. (2012). Understanding theory of change in international development. Justice and Security Research Programme. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259999367_Understanding_Theory_of_ Change_in_International_Development
  26. The Mazatlan Post. (2019, March 24). Documentary on murdered priests will premiere at the Mexican Chamber of Deputies. https://themazatlanpost.com/2019/03/24/documentary-on-murdered-priests-will-pre-miere-at-the-mexican-chamber-of-deputies/
  27. U.S. Department of State. (2019). 2019 report on international religious freedom: Mexico. Office of International Religious Freedom. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MEXICO-2019-INTERNATIO-NAL-RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-REPORT.pdf