Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024): Revista Derecho en Sociedad
ESSAYS

De-escalating conflict, and creating safe spaces for dialogue

Published 2024-09-24

Keywords

  • Safe space for dialogue,
  • action research,
  • human needs theory,
  • peacebuilding praxis

How to Cite

Bremner, D. (2024). De-escalating conflict, and creating safe spaces for dialogue. Derecho En Sociedad, 18(2), 205p – 221p. https://doi.org/10.63058/des.v18i2.245

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

This article delves into the complexities and methodologies of de-escalating conflict and creating safe spaces for dialogue. It emphasizes the significance of context and conflict analysis, alongside relevant frameworks, in understanding peacebuilding processes. The discussion includes critical reflections on peacebuilding praxis, distinguishing between adversarial conflict processes and more cooperative, depoliticized problem-solving approaches. Central to the article is the concept of ‘action research as a safe space for dialogue,’ which is presented as an effective tool for de-escalation and sustaining dialogue. The article illustrates this concept through a brief case study of action research in Georgia, employing the human needs theory framework. The conclusion suggests that the application of action research as a safe space for dialogue could be particularly valuable in addressing conflict and violence in Latin America, contributing to conflict transformation and peacebuilding efforts in the region. Through these insights, the article offers a practical approach to managing and resolving conflicts constructively.

References

  1. Bremner, D. (2005). Human needs and problem-solving approaches to creating new social structures: Action research on conflict resolution in Georgia, 2000-2002 (Doctoral dissertation). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  2. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. London: Arrow Books.
  3. Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human scale development: Conception, application and further reflections. New York: Apex Press.
  4. Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2016). Contemporary conflict resolution (4thed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Webel, C., & Galtung, J. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of peace and conflict studies. New York: Routledge.