Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021)
ENSAYO CIENTÍFICO

Gobierno digital: cómo abordar una oportunidad compleja

Esteban Zolezzi
Coordinador regional de Finanzas y Administración e investigador en FLACSO Secretaría General. MBA con especialidad en Finanzas y Desarrollo Sostenible de la INCAE Business School en Costa Rica, máster en Administración Pública de la Universidad de Michigan en Estados Unidos, y periodista de la Universidad Diego Portales en Chile.

Published 2021-07-19

Keywords

  • Digital Government, Public Administration, New Technologies, Development, Fourth Industrial Revolution.

How to Cite

Zolezzi, E. (2021). Gobierno digital: cómo abordar una oportunidad compleja. Rhombus, 1(2), 14–25. Retrieved from https://revistas.ulacit.ac.cr/index.php/rhombus/article/view/127

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Digital Government is a new area of the Fourth Industrial Revolution that presents important opportunities for improvements in public management efficiency and rapprochement with citizens, however, it is a complex opportunity. The latest OECD study showed that in Latin America the development of Digital Government has been inequal and that while internet access, internet quality and procedures in public services are relevant, there are other strategic factors that need to be consider. This article discusses the situation in the region and then addresses the cases of three countries: Costa Rica, Chile, and Mexico, to understand key strategic factors for Digital Government. The article concludes with the importance of agreements and policy stability, the creation of bodies with higher degrees of autonomy, multisectoral approach and with exclusive dedication to the development of the Digital Government, as well as affirming the importance of requesting and incorporating reports and recommendations by external bodies.

References

  1. Araya, R. y Porrúa, M. (2003). América Latina Puntogob. FLACSO Chile/OEA. http://portal.oas.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=vUj6PSObNiw%3D&tabid=1169
  2. Banco Mundial. (2018). Personas que usan internet (% de la población). https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/IT.NET.USER.ZS?end=2018&locations=ZJ-OE-1W-US-CL-AR-BR-CRMX&start=2000&view=chart
  3. Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa. (2008). Centros Comunitarios Digitales del Sistema E-México: caso de Gómez Farías, Jalisco. http://www.comie.org.mx/congreso/memoriaelectronica/v10/pdf/area_tematica_07/ponencias/0241-F.pdf
  4. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. (2020). E-Government Survey 2020. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2020-Survey/2020%20UN%20E-Government%20Survey%20(Full%20Report).pdf
  5. ESET. (2019). ESET Security Report. Latinoamérica 2019. https://www.welivesecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ESET-security-report-LATAM-2019.pdf
  6. Gobierno Digital Chile. (s. f.). Transformación digital del Estado al servicio de las personas. www.digital.gob.cl
  7. OCDE. (2016). Open Government Data Review of Mexico. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264259270en.pdf?expires=1597805458&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A-3D7A2475697E1687E9785D479C12BB1
  8. OCDE. (2019). Digital Government in Chile. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/f77157e4en.pdf?expires=1597804396&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=515494D6569E7C6F86F-816529B3FE5B5
  9. OCDE. (2020). Estudio económico de Costa Rica. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/estudios-economicos-de-la-ocde-costa-rica-2020_84cbb575-es
  10. Roseth, B., Reyes, A. y Santiso, C. (Ed.) (2018). Fin del trámite eterno: ciudadanos, burocracia y gobierno digital. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/El-fin-del-tr%C3%A1mite-eterno-Ciudadanos-burocracia-y-gobierno-digital.pdf
  11. Speedtest. (2020). Speedtest Global Index. https://www.speedtest.net/global-index
  12. Subsecretaría de Telecomunicaciones de Chile. (2007). Programa Nacional Infocentros. https://www.subtel.gob.cl/programa-nacional-de-infocentros